• Home
  • About
    • Brief CBT
    • Crisis Response Planning
    • Lethal Means Counseling
  • Training
  • Research
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Home
    • About
      • Brief CBT
      • Crisis Response Planning
      • Lethal Means Counseling
    • Training
    • Research
    • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
    • Brief CBT
    • Crisis Response Planning
    • Lethal Means Counseling
  • Training
  • Research
  • Contact Us

Suicide Prevention Therapy

Suicide Prevention TherapySuicide Prevention TherapySuicide Prevention Therapy

Simple things save lives


Craig Bryan, PsyD, ABPP

What is Crisis Response Planning (CRP)?

CRP for suicide prevention is a brief safety planning-type intervention that can be used to reduce an individual's risk for suicidal behavior. CRP is a collaborative process in which someone helps a suicidal person develop a personalized checklist of strategies that can be used during periods of intense emotional distress. Checklists are typically handwritten on an index card for easy, convenient access during times of need. At its core, the CRP helps someone remember what to do when they feel emotionally overwhelmed. 


CRP is comprised of five key sections:

  1. Personal warning signs: personal indicators of an emerging emotional crisis.
  2. Self-management strategies: simple strategies that can be used to help reduce stress or serve as a distraction. 
  3. Reasons for living: things that provide a sense of purpose or meaning in life.
  4. Social support: people who provide support or elevate one's mood during tough times (e.g., friends, family members).
  5. Professional crisis support: contact information for health care providers, crisis hotlines, and emergency services.


CRP usually takes less than 30 minutes to create. An important part of CRP is helping individuals to successfully cope with intense levels of distress when faced with problems that seem unsolvable and/or never-ending.

How is CRP administered?

Originally developed for use by mental health clinicians and other healthcare providers, CRP can also be used by non-healthcare professionals like peer specialists, faith leaders, crisis call center staff, and other members of the community to help people in crisis until they can initiate mental health treatment.  CRP is not a replacement for formal mental health treatment; it is a brief strategy designed to reduce short-term risk for suicide, similar to how cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the Heimlich maneuver, and automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are not replacements for formal medical treatment but can help keep someone alive during a crisis.



Who can learn CRP

  • Mental Health Professionals
  • Physicians & Nurses
  • Crisis Hotline Workers
  • Teachers
  • Faith Leaders
  • College Student Personnel
  • Criminal Justice Staff

Get Trained

How effective is CRP?

CRP is a specific kind of safety planning-type intervention that has been shown to reduce suicide attempts by up to 76% as compared to traditional crisis management procedures, including safety planning (Bryan et al., 2024, 2017). Those same studies also showed that CRP results in faster reductions in suicidal ideation.  A recent meta-analysis of 6 published treatment studies of safety planning-type interventions (Nuij et al., 2021) found that, on average, safety planning-type interventions reduce suicide attempts by 43%. Research also shows that patients prefer CRP over commonly used safety planning methods (Lohani et al., 2024). 


To date, CRP is the only safety planning-type intervention with demonstrated efficacy for reducing suicide risk resulting from multiple randomized clinical trials, the highest level of scientific evidence for an intervention or procedure.


EFFECTIVENESS OF CRP

  • Reduces suicide attempts among patients by 50% or more
  • Leads to faster reductions in suicidal ideation
  • More effective  than traditional crisis management procedures like safety planning

Read the Studies

How does CRP reduce malpractice liability?

Negligence and malpractice liability in the case of a patient death by suicide are largely determined by foreseeability, which typically refers to the procedures used by the clinician to assess the likelihood and possibility of suicidal behavior prior to the act, and reasonable care, which typically refers to the procedures used by the clinician to reduce this risk (Berman, 2006). To address foreseeability and reasonable care, mental health clinicians are expected to:


  • Screen all patients for suicide risk;
  • Conduct a reasonable assessment of a patient's suicide risk level; and
  • Provide appropriate interventions and treatments to mitigate this risk.


Owing to their demonstrated effectiveness for reducing suicide attempts, CRP and other safety planning-type interventions are recommended standard of care practices in mental healthcare settings for clinicians working with suicidal patients (Bryan, 2019). 

References

Berman, A. L. (2006). Risk management with suicidal patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(2), 171-184. 

Bryan, C. J. (2019). Cognitive behavioral therapy for suicide prevention (CBT‐SP): Implications for meeting standard of care expectations with suicidal patients. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 37(3), 247-258.   

Bryan, C. J., Bryan, A. O., Khazem, L. R., Aase, D. M., Moreno, J. L., Ammendola, E., ... & Baker, J. C. (2024). Crisis response planning rapidly reduces suicidal ideation among US military veterans receiving massed cognitive processing therapy for PTSD. Journal of anxiety disorders, 102, 102824. 

Bryan, C. J., Mintz, J., Clemans, T. A., Leeson, B., Burch, T. S., Williams, S. R., ... & Rudd, M. D. (2017). Effect of crisis response planning vs. contracts for safety on suicide risk in US Army soldiers: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of affective disorders, 212, 64-72. 

Lohani, M., Baker, J. C., Elsey, J. S., Dutton, S., Findley, S. P., Langenecker, S. A., ... & Bryan, C. J. (2024). Suicide prevention via telemental health services: insights from a randomized control trial of crisis response plan and self-guided safety planning approaches. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 1-9. 

Lohani, M., Bryan, C. J., Elsey, J. S., Dutton, S., Findley, S. P., Langenecker, S. A., ... & Baker, J. C. (2024). Collaboration matters: a randomized controlled trial of patient-clinician collaboration in suicide risk assessment and intervention. Journal of Affective Disorders, 360, 387-393. 

Nuij, C., van Ballegooijen, W., De Beurs, D., Juniar, D., Erlangsen, A., Portzky, G., ... & Riper, H. (2021). Safety planning-type interventions for suicide prevention: meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 219(2), 419-426. 


Copyright © 2023 Anduril, LLC - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept
OSZAR »